Paromita Dasa
GG News Bureau
New Delhi, 13th August. The ongoing controversy surrounding Hindenburg Research’s latest allegations against the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Chief Madhabi Puri Buch has taken a new turn. A fresh plea has been filed in the Supreme Court, urging an expedited and conclusive investigation by SEBI into the Adani Group’s financial dealings. The petition argues that the serious claims made by Hindenburg have created an “atmosphere of doubt” regarding the integrity of the regulatory body’s probe, thereby necessitating urgent judicial intervention.
The Allegations: A Brief Overview
Hindenburg Research, the American short-seller, stirred the financial and political landscape in India by accusing Madhabi Puri Buch and her husband, Dhaval Buch, of holding stakes in offshore funds allegedly linked to the Adani Group’s financial network. These allegations suggest that the offshore funds, traced back to 2015, are part of a broader, complex network of entities supposedly used by the Adani Group for illicit financial activities, including money siphoning.
The report implies that these alleged connections might have influenced SEBI’s approach to its investigation into the Adani Group, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and regulatory impartiality. SEBI, under Buch’s leadership, has been investigating the Adani Group’s involvement in opaque offshore entities, which Hindenburg claims have been trading shares of Adani Group companies under dubious circumstances.
SEBI Chairman’s Response
- Commitment to Integrity:Madhabi Puri Buch has publicly affirmed SEBI’s commitment to maintaining high standards of regulatory integrity and transparency. She emphasized that SEBI operates with the utmost professionalism and adherence to legal norms, countering claims that suggest otherwise.
- Ongoing Investigations:The SEBI Chairman has assured that the ongoing investigations into the Adani Group are being conducted with diligence. SEBI has been actively engaging with various stakeholders and gathering necessary information to address the concerns raised.
- Transparency and Accountability:In response to the allegations, Buch has highlighted SEBI’s efforts to uphold transparency in its proceedings. She pointed out that SEBI’s actions are guided by statutory mandates and that any attempts to undermine the regulator’s work are unfounded.
- Legal and Procedural Adherence:Buch has reiterated SEBI’s adherence to legal and procedural norms in its investigations. She stressed that the regulator’s actions are driven by a commitment to protecting investors and ensuring market integrity.
The Plea in the Supreme Court
A new chapter in the ongoing saga between Hindenburg Research and the Adani Group has emerged, as a fresh application was filed in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, calling for the immediate conclusion of the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) investigation into the Adani Group. The petition, submitted by advocate Vishal Tiwari, argues that recent allegations made by Hindenburg Research against SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch have created an “atmosphere of doubt,” which makes it essential for the court to step in and ensure that the findings of the investigation are declared promptly.
The Plea’s Argument
The petition by Vishal Tiwari emphasizes the significance of the Supreme Court’s earlier judgment on January 3, 2024, in which the court had set a timeline for SEBI to complete its investigation into the Adani Group. The judgment had directed SEBI to conclude its 24 ongoing investigations into Hindenburg’s initial report against the Adani Group within three months, “preferably.” However, with the new allegations against Buch, Tiwari’s plea argues that there is now an urgent need for the court to intervene and ensure that the investigation is completed without further delay.
Tiwari’s plea suggests that the new allegations have cast a shadow over SEBI’s ability to conduct an impartial and thorough investigation, thereby necessitating judicial oversight. The application urges the Supreme Court to take decisive action to maintain public trust in the regulatory process and to ensure that the investigation is free from any external influences.
Allegations of Offshore Connections
The application referenced a recent blog post by Hindenburg Research, which accused Ms. Buch and her husband of having stakes in offshore funds allegedly linked to the Adani Group. These funds, believed to be controlled by Vinod Adani, the elder brother of Adani Group chairman Gautam Adani, were purportedly used for round-tripping funds and inflating stock prices. The allegations have revived concerns about the transparency and integrity of SEBI’s ongoing investigation into the Adani Group.
Hindenburg’s latest report follows its initial 2023 investigation, which had far-reaching consequences, including the cancellation of Adani Group’s ₹20,000 crore follow-on public offer. According to Hindenburg, SEBI has shown a “surprising lack of interest” in probing the alleged web of undisclosed Mauritius and offshore shell entities linked to the Adani Group, despite the gravity of the claims.
Public Interest and Investor Rights
Advocate Tiwari’s application stressed the importance of resolving the SEBI investigation in a timely manner, citing the public’s right to know and the interests of investors who lost funds following the publication of Hindenburg’s 2023 report. “The right to know about the investigations led by SEBI and its conclusions are essential for the benefit of investors,” the application asserted.
The plea also highlighted whistleblower documents referenced by Hindenburg, which alleged that Ms. Buch’s husband had taken steps to move assets out of his wife’s name ahead of her politically sensitive appointment as SEBI chairperson in 2017. The documents reportedly included an email, allegedly from Mr. Buch to Mauritius fund administrator Trident Trust, requesting to be the sole person authorized to operate certain offshore accounts.
The Call for Judicial Oversight
Tiwari’s plea has called for the Supreme Court to exercise oversight and ensure that SEBI concludes its investigation within a specified time frame. The application argued that such a move is necessary to restore public trust in SEBI’s regulatory processes, particularly in light of the new allegations.
The plea underscores the broader implications of the Adani-Hindenburg controversy, which continues to generate significant attention both in India and globally. The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to intervene and expedite the SEBI investigation could have lasting repercussions for India’s financial regulatory framework and investor confidence.
The Supreme Court’s Role
The Supreme Court’s involvement in the Adani-Hindenburg matter has been closely watched by both national and international observers. The court’s judgment in January had been seen as a critical step in ensuring that SEBI’s investigation into the Adani Group was conducted transparently and within a reasonable timeframe. However, the new allegations have raised fresh concerns about the integrity of the process, prompting Tiwari’s call for the court to take a more active role in overseeing the completion of the probe.
Broader Implications
The controversy surrounding Hindenburg’s allegations and SEBI’s investigation has significant implications for India’s financial regulatory system. The Adani Group, one of India’s largest conglomerates, has been under scrutiny since Hindenburg’s initial report accused it of engaging in stock price manipulation and other financial improprieties. The new allegations against Buch, if proven, could undermine confidence in SEBI’s ability to regulate the financial markets impartially.
Opposition parties and other critics of the government have seized on the controversy to question the Modi administration’s commitment to transparency and accountability. They argue that the new allegations highlight the need for stronger oversight of India’s regulatory bodies and have called for an independent inquiry into SEBI’s handling of the Adani investigation.
SEBI’s Response and the Adani Group’s Position
In response to the allegations, Madhabi Puri Buch and her husband have categorically denied any wrongdoing, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt at character assassination. They have expressed their willingness to cooperate with any inquiry and have asserted that their financial dealings have always been transparent.
The Adani Group, on the other hand, has dismissed the Hindenburg report as a rehash of discredited claims, calling it a “malicious and manipulative” attempt to tarnish the company’s reputation. The conglomerate has pointed to previous investigations that have cleared them of similar accusations, and it maintains that the current probe by SEBI will yield similar results.
Conclusion
As the Supreme Court considers the plea for an expedited conclusion to SEBI’s investigation into the Adani Group, the stakes are high for all parties involved. The Hindenburg allegations have not only cast a shadow over SEBI’s credibility but also reignited broader concerns about the transparency and accountability of India’s financial regulatory bodies.
The outcome of this legal battle could have far-reaching implications for India’s financial markets, regulatory framework, and political landscape. As the nation watches closely, the Supreme Court’s decision could determine the future course of the Adani investigation and the credibility of SEBI under Madhabi Puri Buch’s leadership.
Comments are closed.